Tuesday, July 20, 2010

What Really Matters?

This past Sunday in The Pundit Delusion, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman speculated on the true reason the approval ratings have dropped so low for the Obama administration. The "Obama Paradox," as described by Krugman, has resulted not because he is "too liberal" or "too Mr. Spock," but because he just simply hasn't overcome the big economic problems. I fully agree with this because the general public isn't really going to appreciate the big victories for congress and the president like health and financial reform. Instead we care more about what the President is doing for us, specifically how our jobs and businesses are doing. Krugman presents a very valid point saying that part of the problem is giving too much attention to the pundits in the decision making.

During the peak of our economic crisis instead of pursuing a larger stimulus package and his policies’ actual impact on the economy, Obama went with looking good in the headlines. The economic downfall has pretty much been the story of the Obama presidency thus far, and given that's the one thing people pay attention to there's no question to why he's in trouble. If there is still a question as to what Americans care about, Krugman backs that claim up by citing a Presidential election report by Larry Bartels, finding that economic conditions are the single most important thing influencing a president's chances in re-election. Yes, not television ads, not debates, not t.v news but the state of our economy. In other words if the economy is doing good right before an election, the president has a good shot, but if it’s falling then he’s toast. Families today don't have the time to pay attention and dissect specific policies or legislature passed, but care most about getting the bills paid. To make matters worse there are the widespread increases in unemployment rates that are just adding to the frustration.

With the midterm elections coming up, it's looking like the GOP is poised to get some big victories in November. Whether or not the primary reason for the problems are indeed the "pundit delusions,” there's not much time left to turn things around, and voter's ignorance to policy successes aren't going to change anytime soon. Seeing their jobs in danger, and having to severely limit spending, the American people are looking to punish those in office and aren't going to be very patient in doing so. Krugman sums it up perfectly saying that with midterms turning out sour, the usual suspects will come up such as … 'he was just too liberal,' or 'where'd the passion go?,' but instead the true reason was that Obama simply wasn't doing enough to create jobs.

Monday, July 12, 2010

Immigration law to face further US legal action


A recent Washington Post Article discusses the Obama Administration's legal efforts to stop Arizona's controversial immigration law. The government states that the law is unconstitutional because the power to set immigration policy lies in the hands of the federal government, and not the state. Citing potential "detention and harassment," no argument is made specifically against racial profiling in the lawsuit. There are so many activists groups outraged with this law that it seems like it doesn't have a chance of making it through. If the fed's initial attempt to bump the law fails, the Justice Department will likely make another one looking at racial profiling. Sure the law does say that no racial profiling will occur, but incidents about stopping someone just because they look Hispanic probably will happen. And then how far will it go? Constitutional rights will be questioned, the outrage will gain momentum and the problems will just keep getting bigger and bigger. John McCain and other proponents knows that everybody is all for keeping illegal immigrants out of the country, but should leave the policy making decisions to the federal government.